SISTEM PENENTUAN KEPUTUSAN KELAYAKAN PENERIMA KREDIT MENGGUNAKAN METODE ROC - SAW
DECISION ELIGIBILITY DECISION SYSTEM OF CREDIT RECEIVER USING ROC - SAW METHOD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/juisik.v2i2.167Keywords:
Decision Support System, Credit Eligibility Analysis, Rank Order Centroid, Simple Additive Weighting, Multi Attribute DecisionAbstract
The Bali Mandiri Cooperative is a cooperative that operates in the savings and loan sector. Data processing of savings and loan activities submitted in credit applications is still done manually so that the credit department must make the right decisions, especially if there are doubts in determining decisions for prospective borrowers, where the doubts are because the criteria for prospective borrowers are almost the same, this is having an impact on the company if the wrong decision occurs in the event of bad credit. The decision support system using Rank Order Centroid (ROC) calculations and the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method compares manual and system calculations that show the same results. This system includes data management which provides for managing data criteria, attribute value data, and submitting data (credit applicant data, data selection period, data submission, and decision support system process). This data will produce a credit applicant report and a credit applicant selection report.
References
Kasmir, “Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Edisi Revisi,” Peran. Lap. Keuang. DALAM KEBIJAKSANAAN PEMBERIAN KREDIT Kpd. CALON NASABAH PADA PT. BPR BATANG KAPAS, 2017.
M. Muslihudin and Oktafianto, Pengaruh Risiko Kredit Terhadap Likuiditas Me. 2017.
C. F. Sitepu and H. Hasyim, “PERKEMBANGAN EKONOMI KOPERASI di INDONESIA,” NIAGAWAN, 2018, doi: 10.24114/niaga.v7i2.10751.
N. Nuraeni, “Penentuan Kelayakan Kredit Dengan Algoritma Naïve Bayes Classifier : Studi Kasus Bank Mayapada Mitra Usaha Cabang PGC,” J. Tek. Komput. AMIK BSI, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2017.
I. M. D. P. Asana, I. G. I. Sudipa, and K. A. P. Putra, “A Decision Support System on Employee Assessment Using Analytical Network Process (ANP) and BARS Methods,” J. Tek. Inform. CIT Medicom, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.
I. G. I. Sudipa, I. M. D. P. Asana, I. K. A. G. Wiguna, and I. N. T. A. Putra, “Implementation of ELECTRE II Algorithm to Analyze Student Constraint Factors in Completing Thesis,” in 2021 6th International Conference on New Media Studies (CONMEDIA), 2021, pp. 22–27.
I. G. A. A. M. Aristamy, I. G. I. Sudipa, C. P. Yanti, I. Pratistha, and V. D. Waas, “An Application of a Decision Support System for Senior High School Scholarship with Modified MADM Method,” in 2021 6th International Conference on New Media Studies (CONMEDIA), 2021, pp. 54–59.
I. G. I. Sudipa, P. Sugiartawan, and I. K. A. G. Wiguna, “Modification Weight Criteria With Webbed Model For Selection Artist Music Festival Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” IJCCS (Indonesian J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., vol. 16, no. 1.
I. K. A. G. Wiguna, K. N. Semadi, I. G. I. Sudipa, and I. K. J. Septiawan, “Analisis Sensitivitas Prioritas Kriteria Pada Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Kasus Penentuan Pemberian Kredit),” J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.
F. H. Barron and B. E. Barrett, “Decision quality using ranked attribute weights,” Manage. Sci., vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1515–1523, 1996, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.42.11.1515.
M. Kusmiyanti, Richa Dwi, Suliatun, “Analisis Sensitifitas Model SMART-AHP dengan SMARTER-ROC sebagai Pengambilan Keputusan Multi Kriteria,” pp. 18–19, 2017.
I. G. I. Sudipa and N. M. Sudiani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching Untuk Penentuan Pemberian Kredit (Studi Kasus: KSP Werdhi Mekar Sari Sedana),” J. Sist. Inf. dan Komput. Terap. Indones., 2019, doi: 10.33173/jsikti.23.
I. G. I. Sudipa and I. A. D. Puspitayani, “Analisis Sensitivitas AHP-SAW dan ROC-SAW dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria,” Int. J. Nat. Sci. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–95, 2019.
A. Syarifudin and A. Y. Ananta, “RANCANG BANGUN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN KELAYAKAN PEMBERIAN KREDIT MENGGUNAKAN,” vol. 2015, 2015.
I. Kaliszewski and D. Podkopaev, “Simple additive weighting - A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods,” Expert Syst. Appl., 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.042.
Y. J. Wang, “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.02.002.
M. Danielson and L. Ekenberg, “A Robustness Study of State-of-the-Art Surrogate Weights for MCDM,” Gr. Decis. Negot., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 677–691, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10726-016-9494-6.
F. H. Barron and B. E. Barrett, “The efficacy of SMARTER - Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Extended to Ranking,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 93, no. 1–3, pp. 23–36, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8.
P. L. Kunsch and A. Ishizaka, “A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal ilmiah Sistem Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
