Prediksi Tingkat Resiko Stroke Pasien Berbasis Gejala Klinik Menggunakan Multilayer Perceptron

Authors

  • Tince Etlin Tallo Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Rio Sanmala Pellokila Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Gilberth Marchobend Marselino Lopo Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Juniar Seventeen Briliant Anakay Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Juan Rizky Mannuel Ledoh Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Clarissa Elfira Amos Pah Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Hawu Yogia Pradana Uly Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/juisik.v6i2.2513

Keywords:

Efisiensi Fitur, Machine Learning, Multilayer Perceptron, Prediction, Prediksi Stroke.

Abstract

Stroke is a condition that represents one of the leading causes of death and permanent disability worldwide; therefore, early diagnosis is essential to minimize associated risks. This study aims to implement the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) method on two different datasets to analyze the effect of the number of input attributes on stroke risk prediction performance. The study was conducted using two public datasets with variations in the number of records (35,000 and 70,000 instances) and the number of attributes (17 and 16 features). The experimental method was divided into two scenarios: Scenario 1 utilized all available attributes, while Scenario 2 employed only the intersecting attributes (two features) to evaluate model efficiency. Model performance was assessed using a confusion matrix with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score as evaluation metrics. The results indicate that the MLP model achieved accuracy ranging from 80% to 98% across both datasets. A significant finding shows that feature dimensionality reduction in Scenario 2, using only two input attributes, was still able to achieve accuracy above 80% on Dataset 2 and Dataset 3, demonstrating computational efficiency without a substantial decline in performance. This study demonstrates that MLP remains effective and efficient even with limited features, thereby highlighting that appropriate feature selection can improve model efficiency without significantly compromising performance. These findings are expected to serve as a reference for the development of artificial intelligence-based disease prediction systems in the future.

References

Awad, M., & Khanna, R. (2015). Efficient learning machines: Theories, concepts, and applications for engineers and system designers. Apress. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=Bk4nCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP3&dq=Awad,+M.,+%26+Khanna,+R.+(2015).+Efficient+Learning+Machines:+Theories,+Concepts,+and+Applications.+Apress.&ots=aUTGRDqrNG&sig=RvhkV2TdFDzQgFqhDkCXv_Gnqw4

Chakraborty, P., Bandyopadhyay, A., Sahu, P. P., Burman, A., Mallik, S., Alsubaie, N., … Soufiene, B. O. (2024). Predicting stroke occurrences: A stacked machine learning approach with feature selection and data preprocessing. BMC Bioinformatics, 25(1), 329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05866-8

Chollet, F., & Chollet, F. (2021). Deep Learning with Python, Second Edition. Simon and Schuster.

Dritsas, E., & Trigka, M. (2022). Stroke Risk Prediction with Machine Learning Techniques. Sensors, 22(13), 4670. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134670

Elloker, T., & Rhoda, A. J. (2018). The relationship between social support and participation in stroke: A systematic review. African Journal of Disability, 7. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v7i0.357

Emon, M. U., Keya, M. S., Meghla, T. I., Rahman, Md. M., Mamun, M. S. A., & Kaiser, M. S. (2020). Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches in Stroke Prediction. 2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), 1464–1469. Coimbatore, India: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA49313.2020.9297525

Feigin, V. L., Brainin, M., Norrving, B., Martins, S. O., Pandian, J., Lindsay, P., … Rautalin, I. (2025). World Stroke Organization: Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2025. International Journal of Stroke: Official Journal of the International Stroke Society, 20(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241308142

Folorunsho, O., Fagbuagun, O. A., Ochidi, I., Faboya, O. O., & Hassan, J. B. (2025). Performance Comparison of Feature Selection Techniques for Stroke Prediction Using Multilayer Perceptron. 10(1).

Jambi, L., Hamad, A., Salah, H., & Sulieman, A. (2024). Stroke and Disability: Incidence, Risk Factors, Management, and Impact. Journal of Disability Research, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.57197/JDR-2024-0094

Lai, W., Zhao, J., Du, J., & Zhang, C. (2026). Predictive Value of the FDAPR Index for Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Machine Learning Study Based on a Multilayer Perceptron. International Journal of General Medicine, Volume 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S575324

Mainali, S., Darsie, M. E., & Smetana, K. S. (2021). Machine Learning in Action: Stroke Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 734345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.734345

Pratama, I. B., Fanani, A. Z., Soeleman, M. A., & Kumalasari, V. I. (2026). Optimizing Stroke Prediction Using Backward Elimination and SMOTE with C4. 5 and K-Nearest Neighbors. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 8(2), 2529–2549.

Rahman, A. A., Amruta, N., Pinteaux, E., & Bix, G. J. (2021). Neurogenesis After Stroke: A Therapeutic Perspective. Translational Stroke Research, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-020-00841-w

Rahman, N. H. A., Yin, C. H., & Zulkafli, H. S. (2024). Activation functions performance in multilayer perceptron for time series forecasting. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3123(1), 070001. AIP Publishing LLC. Retrieved from https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-abstract/3123/1/070001/3309840

Sah, N. K. P., Rathi, H., Gangwar, S., Tiwari, R., & Pal, D. (2025). Epidemiological Profile and Risk Factors of Stroke in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus, 17(10), e94241. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.94241

Sailasya, G., & Kumari, G. L. A. (2021). Analyzing the Performance of Stroke Prediction using ML Classification Algorithms. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120662

Salam, A., El Hibaoui, A., & Saif, A. (2021). A comparison of activation functions in multilayer neural network for predicting the production and consumption of electricity power. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 11(1), 163.

Sharma, C., Sharma, S., Kumar, M., & Sodhi, A. (2022). Early Stroke Prediction Using Machine Learning. 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), 890–894. Chiangrai, Thailand: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA54658.2022.9765307

Singh, R. K., . S., Samanta, S., Yunus, N., Kumar, M., & Sinha, R. I. (2023). Acute ischemic stroke: Management approach. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 12(2), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20230408

Venketasubramanian, N., Yudiarto, F. L., & Tugasworo, D. (2022). Stroke Burden and Stroke Services in Indonesia. Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra, 12(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1159/000524161

Vu, T., Kokubo, Y., Inoue, M., Yamamoto, M., Mohsen, A., Martin-Morales, A., … Araki, M. (2024). Machine learning approaches for stroke risk prediction: Findings from the suita study. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 11(7), 207.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16

How to Cite

Tince Etlin Tallo, Rio Sanmala Pellokila, Gilberth Marchobend Marselino Lopo, Juniar Seventeen Briliant Anakay, Juan Rizky Mannuel Ledoh, Clarissa Elfira Amos Pah, & Hawu Yogia Pradana Uly. (2026). Prediksi Tingkat Resiko Stroke Pasien Berbasis Gejala Klinik Menggunakan Multilayer Perceptron. Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 6(2), 592–603. https://doi.org/10.55606/juisik.v6i2.2513

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.