Resistensi Simbolik dan Aktivisme Digital: Analisis Fenomena Garuda Biru dalam Mengawal Demokrasi dan Konstitusi Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/juitik.v6i1.2097Keywords:
Blue Garuda, Digital Activism, Digital Democracy, Public Sphere, Radical HumanismAbstract
The planned ratification of the 2024 Regional Head Election Bill, which annulled the Constitutional Court's decision, triggered massive public resistance manifested through the "Blue Garuda Emergency Warning" symbol. This study analyzes the phenomenon using Christian Fuchs's Radical Humanism perspective and Jürgen Habermas's public sphere concept. Using a qualitative approach with a case study method, data were collected from social media platforms X and Instagram during the critical period of August 21-23, 2024. The research aims to dissect how visual symbols function as a medium of criticism amidst the stagnation of formal democratic channels. The findings show that the Blue Garuda is not merely a viral trend but an instrument of de-alienation that creates a counter-public sphere. Citizens engage in activism by transforming collective emotions into real political movements, both in the digital and physical realms. This phenomenon represents a social healing mechanism for the silencing of citizens' voices while marking a crisis of legitimacy for state institutions. The study concludes that Indonesia's digital democracy has evolved into a substantive corrective force, where nationalism is redefined as loyalty to the constitution and humanitarian values, not blind obedience to the authorities.
References
Alam, S. (2021). Peran media sosial dalam pembentukan opini publik di Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2r6ud
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270066
Fuchs, C. (2020). Communication and capitalism: A critical theory. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book45
Fuchs, C. (2022). Digital ethics. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book62
Fuchs, C. (2023). Digital democracy and the digital public sphere. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003284722
Gomez, R., Corrales, J., & Valenzuela, S. (2023). Digital democracy and the future of citizen participation. Journal of Digital Society, 5(2), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/27694865.2023.00045
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. MIT Press.
Haussler, T. (2018). Discourse and democracy: Habermas beyond the public sphere. Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(2), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12146
Puspitasari, L. (2024). Demokrasi digital dan aktivisme warga dalam polemik RUU Pilkada 2024. Jurnal Politik Digital, 3(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.7454/jpd.v3i1.128
Rianto, D. (2023). Tantangan demokrasi digital bagi negara dan pemerintahan modern. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 21(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v21i2.7501
Santoso, B., Nugraha, D., & Yuliani, R. (2023). Simbol Garuda dan representasi nasionalisme dalam budaya politik Indonesia. Jurnal Budaya dan Politik, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22146/jbp.87923
Saud, M., & Margono, H. (2021). Digital participation and Indonesian youth political engagement. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 14(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1715611
Syuhra, R., & Suhandoko, A. (2024). Peran media sosial dalam ekspresi kritik politik masyarakat Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Nusantara, 6(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.33366/jkn.v6i1.3451
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The network society (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739114
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Informatika dan Komunikasi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.















